23. October 2008 by admin.

The Ayers net of influence on our national Education System

3,000 college professors from such prestigious colleges as Harvard, Brown, and Princeton, have signed a “friends of Bill Ayers petition” to “vouch for his distinguished service as an education reformer”.

How telling is it that 3,000 college professors could muster the courage to defend the co-founder of the weather underground, a radical 60s group that used bombings on American soil to try to intimidate the government to stop the war in Vietnam.

But what kind of education reform is William Ayers championed for? He was the originator of the so-called “free school”. A school that allowed students to address teachers by name, a school that allowed students to pick their own curriculum, and a school that dispensed with “grading”, because grading created a climate of unhealthy competition that alienated the children who did not get the best grades, and also traumatized them by labeling them “failures”.

3,000 college professors managed to come forward. Ask yourself, is your student being taught by a college professor who calls himself a friend of a man who should still be in jail for bombing the U.S? Ask yourself if an unrepentant man, a man who sees violence as a legitimate means of changing his country’s policies (so long as those policies are socialist) should be given social support, social approval. If we approve of Ayers, and by extension his bomb-tactics, then we are telling our children that 1. you are not accountable for your actions, 3. violence, “the right violence” (as they say), is a legitimate means to affect your nation’s policies, or maybe just your community’s.

Ayers was the co-writer of the grant that created the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), written, it was said, on behalf of the “Chicago School Reform Initiative”, of which Ayers was the co-chair.

To give you a sense of Ayers’ approach to education, and what he sought to promote through the CAC and a number of other initiatives (such as the local school council- which would give that local school council total control over everything teachers said and did in their classrooms), listen to his own words when he attended a conference called “La educacion es Revolucion!”held in Venzuala by Hugo Chavez. Ayers admired,in his own words “the profound educational reforms underway here in Venezuela under the leadership of President Chavez” and he said he “share[d] the belief that education is the motor-force of revolution.”, an agenda that was also outlined in the grant proposal for the Chicaco Annenberg Challenge.

Ayers seeks to create more bomb throwers, and 3,000 of the folks who educate our children at the college level, call themselves friends of Ayers, which shows not that Ayers is a respected figure, but that socialist revolutionary radicalism is rampant in our college system. If your child is being taught by one of these 3,000 (as soon as we get the list we will publish it), then perhaps you need to make a call to the dean of your school (unless the dean is ALSo on the list, in which case, if it’s a publicly funded college, call your congressman to demand all federal funds be rescinded) asking why your child is being taught by advocates of terrorism.

Ivo Fisic

Posted in Freedom News | Print | No Comments »

23. October 2008 by admin.

Press Release: Obama & DNC admit all allegations in Berg v. Obama
Obama & DNC Admit All Allegations of Federal Court Lawsuit - Obama’s “Not” Qualified to be President

Obama Should Immediately Withdraw his Candidacy for President

________________________________________________________

In the press release Berg opines that by defaulting, Obama and DNC admit the candidate is not qualified to run and demands his immediate withdrawal.

By not responding to the Requests for Admissions, the following happened:

According to Rule 36 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party upon whom requests for admissions have been served must respond, within 30 days, or else the matters in the requests will be automatically deemed conclusively admitted for purposes of the pending action.

According to Rule 36 of the FRCP, Obama admitted to everything that was in the Requests for Admissions, as did the DNC with their Request for Admissions. All because they didn’t respond within the thirty (30) time frame allowed by law. Any problem with Rule 36 should be directed to your elected representatives in Washington so they can work on legislation to change the current FRCP rules.

The media propaganda machine keep on ignoring the facts. But here’s a news flash: you can ignore reality, but you cannot ignore its consequences. That kite won’t fly anymore once the Judge has ruled. The question is, when that will be.

Berg: “Our website obamacrimes.com now has 50.7 + million hits. We are urging all to spread the word of our website – and forward to your local newspapers, radio and TV stations. Berg again stressed his position regarding the urgency of this case as, “we” the people, are heading to a “Constitutional Crisis” if this case is not resolved forthwith.”

Judah Benjamin on Texas Darling is quoting the expert opinion of Jeff Schreiber on America’s Right. He upholds Phil Berg’s claim on these grounds:

“A Candidate for the Office of POTUS has (…) no form of Privacy Protection in Regard to matters pertaining to Eligibility for that Office. (…) The mere assertion of such a Claim is in, and of, itself grounds for Supposition of Ineligibility. (…) This Motion teeters on the brink of an admission of guilt, in fact appears to be one, in and of itself. Berg (…) SPECIFICALLY asked for ten Legal Admissions or Refutations and these have not been forthcoming. Instead, Obama and the DNC filed for Dismissal and a Protective Order, in other words, SPECIFICALLY refused to supply any information whatsoever. Obviously, Berg has been planning this because if Judge Surrick grants these motions, and until specific Refutation with supporting evidence is granted, Obama is Legally Admitting Ineligibility and that he is not a US Citizen, of any sort. It is ONLY a Technicality, BUT a technicality of devastating proportions. The DNC is admitting that they are fully aware of this, Legally.”

Nevertheless, today he’s not optimistic: “every fiber of my being tells me that Berg’s suit will be dismissed for lack of standing, I’ve nonetheless had this nagging, itching feeling in my gut that Judge Surrick may just surprise everyone and come down, at least partially, for Berg. The rumblings I’ve heard from three different people, while CERTAINLY NOT CONCLUSIVE, do slightly reinforce my nagging gut feeling.”

Berg - of course - has stated he’ll take it ‘all the way’ (donations welcome on Phil’s site).

In the meantime the campaign team has let it be known that the candidate is continuing … eh, suspending his campaign on Thursday to “visit his very sick grandmother in Hawaii.”

Welcome home, Barry! A recent article in the Honolulu Advertiser regarding the case states that the Director of the Board of Health is being pressed to make the document (COLB) public, which she refuses to do on privacy considerations.

If he gets the COLB, how is he going to explain the false one?

In an attempt to deflect attention the tactic is used to smear the messenger …

… in Honolulu an action has been filed by Andy Martin and investigative team:

Contrarian Commentary: “High Noon in Hawaii: Barack Obama and Andy Martin collide in the Aloha State”

Barack Obama and Andy Martin confront each other in Honolulu. Andy Martin’s investigative team provokes a “suspension” of Obama’s campaign and a desperate trip to Hawai’i by the presidential candidate The drama builds to a Hollywood “High Noon” confrontation between good and evil (…) >>>

One more interesting point raised by Philip Berg: why hasn’t the DNC vetted their candidate properly? Word has it that they considered it unnecessary since he was already vetted to be a senator. Problem is, the rules are different. It stands to reason that someone applying for the position of POTUS would have to meet a stricter set of qualifications than a senator.

Prefer action over contemplation? Gary on Restore the Republic is proposing an action plan to inundate the accomplices in the MSM (scroll down to comment #1).

The links and service points:

- The official Phil Berg website.
- Here is a link to the court documents filed by Berg.

- Click here to sign the petition.

Join the Cause on Facebook.

Related:

- “Law Suits like Kittens”
- “The October Surprises (plural)”
- “Of “The October Surprise”
- Stop the Obama Constitutional Crisis

Posted in Freedom News | Print | 1 Comment »