27. March 2009 by admin.

Posted in Freedom News | Print | No Comments »

27. March 2009 by admin.

World Union or World War, the competing pulls

The world is at a point where it is now producing the harmonic and disharmonic extremes necessary to create a worldwide change of contract in the form of new unions, a world union, or the dissolution of large unions altogether. One of the greatest players in this dangerous game is China itself. China has been called the factory of the world, but it’s closer to an assembly plant than a plant that produces anything from scratch.

It is now trying to move as fast as it can, and rightly so, to begin to build from scratch, as it were. But even as China does this, those plants that built from scratch, much of South. East Asia, they lose their contracts. China’s dilemma is that while it must necessarily develop its own inhouse powers, sovereignty, it is still yet unavoidably stuck in the system due to the overwhelming amount of magic dollars it holds from nations all around the world.

So while it must make moves that will trigger disharmonic reactions from the global community, it believes it needs the protection of a global governor to look after its interests, thus the U.N could be an effective tool to put a leash on a spend-drunk world, even as it encourages the very behavior amongst its own people.

China calls for a world dollar, harmonic extreme, even as it tightens its restrictions on foreign purchase of chinese companies, offers tax incentives to small businesses that sell to the chinese, running campaigns to try to create their own consumer class to replace ours…..that’s just one example…believe me, just about EVERY nation is doing the EXACT same thing…negotiating for harmony while promoting protectionism, isolation, nationalism, whatever you want to call it…..

Perhaps everyone’s just trying to keep all their options open, or some are feeling they are just biding their time…it has all the feel of the fat nations scrambling to build power just before the great war.

Germany was trying to expand her Colonial Empire and madly build her Navy while England was securing her trade routes and defending her colonies. I see the same things happen worldwide. Chinese naval presence and Russian naval presence has greatly expanded. As powerful nations become more fervent about taking care of themselves, the nationalism and militancy will keep ratcheting up, as it already has.

There are multiple contracts around the world that tie everyone together in weird ways that even they don’t understand, or now even want. So far, Obama has submitted to Russia and China, given mixed signals to North Korea, abandoned our Eastern European allies (whose conservative governments are falling apart, and who have been hardest hit in Europe from the isolationist practices of the West), brazenly challeneged Talibani…wait……earlier he capitulated…so…mixed signals to the Taliban……As before the grerat war, uncertainty, crazy treaties, mangled networks of committment, all that exists in spades as it did almost one hundred years ago….

…only in this case it’s the buregoning of a world-wide civilization against the equally burgeoning disolution of multiple unions.

Harmonic systems fall in on themselves…isolation…..the sameness marks the different more easily, more acutely……..
Disharmonic systems eventually lose the social contract that guarantees the rule of law, the value of money, etc….
In disharmonic systems heading towards disolution, extreme harmonic pockets begin to form, which contribute to greater disharmony amongst the competing groups

A contract change or dissolution occurs….

This says nothing about whether the contract change will create greater self power or greater state power, only that a change MUST occur. In our scenario, the ability for nations to negotiate is becoming increasingly difficult as they are all in China’s shape, to one degree or another, desperate to become self-reliant but believing they need some larger governing body to protect their stuff from other protectionists.

What does this talk of world union do to the citizens of the respective nations? Look at the riots you’ll see coming out of the G20. They’ll be more pitched than usual. A lot of these goons come from the leftist paid camps orchestrated by Soros and other Statists, but there will be far more there from groups that have completely different agendas than Soros (give the acolytes some red meat to chew on even as you are secretly in the G20 room, negotiating, in a manner of speaking).

It will be interesting to see if the Soros gang can produce the nuanced methods of controlling people who are seemingly there to protest the same thing his hired people are there to protest.

When looking at the G20 Summit as a barometer of the chance for a dramatic contract change of world proportions, look for a few key tell-tale signs, the degree and scope of the extremes of harmonic and disharmonic themes, the global cry for world governance combated with the extreme examples of disharmonic nationalist “negotiating points”…powerful nations will want exceptions to certain world governance standards….etc….

China wants the U.S. to assure her that she’s not going to print any more money. An inflationary dollar would render China’s U.S holdings worthless. Talk of a World Currency is a threat against the U.S. which Geithner sent confusing signals on, his initial reaction being one of contemplation, not of out-of-hand rejection.

The Statists running America see the World Governing Body as an opportunity to place a wall between their efforts to force a contract change and the citizens. However, a world governing body that fully represented their interests may not be as easy to pull off as they would imagine. And the effect of that level of forced contract change would produce a powerful, worldwide backlash, a world war fought within nations largely, with some nation-to-nation fighting, but largely a world rung red with civil wars as national bodies that support the world body would attempt to keep its union together by force.

Given the balance of power in military technology that favors defensive, cheap power, witness the lessons of Iraq and the ongoing lessons of Afghanistan, this attempt will be, in the long run, futile, unless there is a dramatic sea change in technology that produces a weapon capable of controlling a mass of people without destroying everyone and everything (too costly).

Witness the first signs of budget militaries using drone aircraft, such as Iran recently in Iraq, or garage engineers successfully building shoulder 76 cal cannons and rail guns.

This dichotomy is acute throughout the world in almost every aspect of human industry and governance.

But coming to the realization that these global builders cannot accept, that the days of massive governance are temporarily over., before violence occurs is the question we must all ask ourselves as we watch the G20. Long live Community.

WorldNewsTweets
This article may be freely used so long as the link above is included and you credit
Paul Collier
webmersion publisher

Posted in Freedom News | Print | No Comments »