Info

You are currently browsing the Freedom News- An American Blog weblog archives for August, 2009.

August 2009
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031  

Archive for August 2009

8-15-9 Palin News- Matthew Littman’s sexist, racist remarks- a huffpo writer- #palin #news

Matthew Littman writes for the Huffington Post. he has also written speeches for Joe Biden. Why does this matter? Matthew Littman is a sexist, facsist racist who once again showed his true colors last night with Laura Ingram on Fox. In this segment, shown above, Littman makes the comment that he will only be interested in following Sarah Palin in a few years when she’s on VH1 dating Flava Flav. Why did he choose a black man? Because in his racist mind, you couldn’t get more offensive than accusing a white woman of dating a black man? Why did he impugn her marriage? Because he is a sexist seeking to attack a woman where she lives, attacking her very family.This last remark is so beyond the pale that we feel Huffington Post MUST let Littman go or have whatever remaining sponsors they have left boycotted until they stop supporting racist, sexist fascists like Matthew Littman.Here are a few of Huffington Post’s sponsors, at least some of the sponsors we found on their pages:

sears.com

people.com

simpleshoes.com

military.com

visitwilliamsburg.com

progressivedirect.com  - also sponsors olbermann and maddow- the demonizers of the left

danielsilvabooks.com

pulse360.com

We hope to pick 1-3 sponsors to target for a boycott with this demand- if Huffington Post does not fire Matthew Littman for his over-the-top sexist, racist remarks against Sarah Palin, we will boycott your business.

Pulse360 is an ad service, but we are not sure that all their ads are from this service.

Irregardless, major companies like Sears should know their ads are going on pages that support the racist-sexist Matthew Littman.  Don’t you think they need to hear from you?

If you use Pulse360 on y0ur blogs, sites, etc, please let them know you will no longer be using them unless they reject Huffington Post (unless Huffpo fires Matthew Littman).

for more information and related articles across the web, visit our new main freedom news site:

http://freedomist.com/2009/08/15/8-15-9-palin-news-huffington-posts-matthe-littman-uses-racist-sexist-remarks-to-attack-palin-palin-news/

freedom news 8-15-9 Palin News- Huffington Post’s Matthew Littman uses racist, sexist.. http://bit.ly/Lmr89 #freedom #news

8-14-9 Obama News- flag@whitehouse.gov web report- #obama #news

8-14-9 Obama News-  White House
encourages U.S. citizens to “snitch” on each
other - #obama
#news

Editorial Rerport by Valia Judy

White House encourages U.S. citizens to “snitch” on each other



The White House has created the
email address

flag@whitehouse.gov

for the purpose of
encouraging “snitching” on anyone who

spreads disinformation about healthcare
reform. The creation of this

email address has caused an uproar amongst
Republicans,

Independents, and people who enjoy the right of freedom of speech.







This is a statement taken directly
from Whitehouse.gov:




There is a lot of disinformation
about health insurance reform out there, spanning from control of

personal
finances to end of life care.  These rumors often travel just below the surface
via chain emails

or through casual conversation.  Since we can’t keep track of
all of them here at the White House,

we’re asking for your help. If you get an
email or see something on the web about health insurance

reform that seems
fishy, send it to


flag@whitehouse.gov
.



Wait a minute, read this sentence
again closely:

These rumors often travel just below the surface via chain
emails or through casual conversation
.”




Is the White House suggesting that
if I hear Joe the Plumber talking with his friends over

coffee about how health
care reform eliminates our right to choose our own health care,

that I should
report him to


flag@whitehouse.gov

simply for speaking his personal opinion


on an issue? This sounds like a
violation of our right to free speech to me,


which is preserved in the U.S.
Constitution in Amendment 1:




Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting

the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press;

or the
right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances.





I also find Linda Douglass's choice
of the word “disinformation” interesting.

If you look up the definition of
“disinformation” on Wikipedia,

you will find that it is not just spreading false
information,

but it is “false or inaccurate information that is spread
deliberately.

It is synonymous with and sometimes called Black propaganda.

It may include the distribution of forged documents, manuscripts, and
photographs,

or spreading malicious rumors and fabricated intelligence.


Disinformation should not be confused with misinformation, information that is
unintentionally false

Linda used a poor example of disinformation by using that Drudge Report
headline,

as the word eliminate was in quotations in the article, meaning that
the article does not state

Obama eliminating private insurance as a fact, but
that it might or might not be true.

The quotes around the word eliminate could
also imply sarcasm, depending on how you interpret it.

So the White House not only accuses its own citizens of spreading
disinformation,

but it uses a news headline (just the headline, not even the
news article itself) with quotations

Let’s get the facts straight: The Healthcare bill itself is over 1000 pages, and
Democrat Arlen

Specter admits he hasn’t even read the bill himself. Spekter says
that congress “

divides up the bills” and that they have to pass legislation
“very fast.” So the White House

can tell us to report each other for spreading
disinformation, while at the same time

they not fully read the bill to even know
what information is in it! How, then, can they claim what is

and isn't
disinformation if they don't even know the facts contained in the bill they're
trying to pass?



Sources:



1.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/facts-are-stubborn-things/



2.

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

3.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disinformation

8-14-9 Green Jobs Czar Targets Free Press- uses govt power to attack the free press

Obama’s Green Jobs Czar Uses Racism To Target Glenn Beck

Read this article about Van Jones using his personal organization to do the bidding of the White House, to attempt to shut down dissent.  Barack Obama is an Elitist, though, not a racist.  He loves all the colors of the rainbow so long as they are wealthy.  He’ll use minority poor as human shields to hide his  Elitist Agenda, to destroy American Individualism.

Here is a link to an article about the PR firm that is also assisting this fascist attempt to silence critics of King Obama

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/2009/08/13/powerful-new-york-pr-firm-helps-campaign-against-glenn-beck

8-14-9 Olbermann Boycott Campaign

8-14-9 Boycott Wars- the sponsors of Olbermann…will we boycott these people for supporting Fascist Propaganda and accusing americans of being racists?

LIST OF SPONSORS:

http://freedomist.com/2009/08/14/8-14-9-boycott-wars-the-sponsors-of-olbermann-will-we-boycott-these-people-for-supporting-fascist-propaganda-and-accusing-americans-of-being-racists/

Obama News- US Gives $10 bil aid to Brazil…for offshore drilling..good enough for them, but not for us

By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Wednesday, August 12, 2009 4:20 PM PT

Energy: We didn’t hear the administration crow about it, but Brazil is about to get $10 billion from U.S. taxpayers to develop its offshore oil reserves. It’s not a bad idea, but something’s still wrong with the big picture.

(snip)–Having said all this, the question remains: Why must we go so far and spend so much taxpayer money to drill oil when we could unleash our private sector to do it here for free ?

Eximbank officials are serving America’s interests by developing Brazil. But our Congress, which refuses to encourage offshore drilling, and our Interior Department, which is pulling permits for inland development, are not.

At the center of it is energy security. If lending money to Brazil for oil is a good idea, isn’t freeing our own companies to develop America’s vast reserves an even better one.]